Reader Mail: Selective crossing guards
22
March
Sent in by Matthew. I know there are some excellent and friendly crossing guards, but what are your opinions on his thoughts?
He writes:
Dear Hoboken411,
I’ve lived in Hoboken since 2000 and have owned here for the past four years. I put up with the high taxes, poor roads, double parking, corruption and governmental waste. I don’t know why, but I do. I guess this letter is my first step in trying to do something about it.
Each morning, my girlfriend and I walk to the PATH - just like thousands of other Hobokenites. During the school year, most street corners in this town are manned by some incompetent, most likely overpaid, city employee whose responsibility it is to manage traffic so the children don’t get injured.
Believe me, I’m all about safety of our children. What bothers me is the fact that these “crossing guards” selectively do their jobs. Besides not being as effective as they can with crossing the children (I’ve seen them talking on their cell phones/other, as children walk through intersection unguarded), they refuse to assist in crossing adults.
Now, do I need a crossing guard? No, I don’t. However, if these people are being paid (and most likely qualifying for pensions, etc.), and are there for the safety of our younger citizens - don’t you think that they should be commissioned to look after the safety of all of Hoboken’s citizens? Especially since the older ones pay their salaries?
When asked, their response is, “we don’t cross adults.” Why not? You’re being paid for cross-walk safety. I guarantee you if someone got hurt while that guard was on duty, the city would be sued - so why be selective?
I wont even attempt to voice my frustration about not having some sort of crossing guard at those intersections by the PATH. Why would they put crossing guards at a low-level intersection like 4th and Jefferson but not right in front of the Starbucks where I’ve seen people almost get run over multiple times.
This town is upside down. The parasites that run it will milk it till it’s spent. We probably spend six or seven figures on the crossing guard budget each year - and as usual, for sub-par performance.

















21. blahblahblah | March 22nd, 2007 at 11:51 am
SarahC wrote:
I only copied and pasted what i found in the research as far as duties, they may be outdated but the overall function is the same…safety of the kids in school zones…anyone remember the game FROGGER….adults cross at ur own risk…but this is life, if u get hit you cant start over…you will get hurt and the frapachino will suffer
22. Cat | March 22nd, 2007 at 11:53 am
Weird.
Anyway, I’ve never had a problem with the crossing guards I see. The ones I don’t see, like on 4 and Clinton, are another question. That’s a dangerous corner and we need one there, but I don’t know whether there is actually someone assigned there or not.
To the OP: Crossing guards are supposed to cross the kids, not grown-ups who theoretically know how to cross a street and petition city hall for traffic lights.
No list of good crossing guards is complete without Cathy from 4th and Madison. She’s friendly, upbeat, and hard-working no matter the weather or workload.
23. sah | March 22nd, 2007 at 11:58 am
Obviously adults can cross themselves, but if neither the adult or the car know who has the right-of-way and the crossing guard is standing there with their hands in their pockets, that’s when it gets dangerous. When people see a crossing guard, they assume they’re in charge of all movement at the intersection, including kids, adults and cars. Honestly, we’d probably all do better if some of them weren’t there at all to confuse things!
24. hoboken411 | March 22nd, 2007 at 12:34 pm
Cat wrote:
Yes, the site is experiencing heavy usage during the day, and may suffer from occasional “blackouts”… I was supposed to upgrade the system last weekend, but that didn’t pan out. I’ll be doing it this weekend.
In meantime, be sure you “copy and paste” any long post, and save it in an email or word document before you submit it just in case it craps out. You won’t lose your post this way.
Sorry, and hope to have it all tuned up by Monday.
25. ahobokenguy | March 22nd, 2007 at 12:37 pm
Tried posting on CVS thread and was also getting a dupe post msg but my post never posted
26. hoboken411 | March 22nd, 2007 at 12:53 pm
ahobokenguy wrote:
What happened in that instance is that your message was caught up in the “Spam Filter” for some reason. If that happens again (where you post and it doesn’t appear), just give it some time, and when I see it get to the spam section, I’ll release it.
Your CVS comment is now there.
27. Cracker | March 22nd, 2007 at 1:17 pm
ahhhhh, the little boy needs some help crossing the street? here, hold my hand, ok, hold on, wait, wait, wait, ok, come on, let’s go, hurry, hurry, ok, there you go. Have fun at work.
28. emarche | March 22nd, 2007 at 1:25 pm
…and once again, Cracker reveals one of his fetishes. Let’s see…so far we’ve got horses and little boys. What’s next?
29. wiseone | March 22nd, 2007 at 7:59 pm
I walk down 3rd street every morning as the kids are walking to school. The lady at 3rd and Garden is pretty good. And she has stopped cars for adults and everytime she does I say thank you since I know she doesn’t have to do that for me. However, on 3rd and Bloomfield, they have had quite a few bad ones. There was one lady who stood there and did essentially nothing. I think she was afraid of cars.
And now there is a woman who just stands on the sidewalk at the spot where someone will actually try to cross the street. Everyday I am wishing she’d just move to a better spot so I don’t have to constantly walk around her.
30. wgenese | March 22nd, 2007 at 8:40 pm
Jesus f**cking Christ, who cares if the crossing guards don’t help the “adults” as long as they are, without fail, watching out for our children. The concern should be how well they look out for the wee ones.
Here, It’s this f**cking easy… STOP at the corner. LOOK in all directions, if a car is coming and doesn’t stop, give him\her the finger or some choice words(optional) and wait for an opening. NO able bodied adult needs a crossing guard for this. They are at the corners during, and only during school opening and closing witch would lead one to believe that they are there for the children.
Now, does the fact that they are there anyway mean that they should help adults cross? I could care less. I can do it fine on my own, Thank You. Do adults really need help crossing the street? Seniors and children.
My friends mom was a crossing guard at 11th and Willow for 20 some odd years. They get paid s**t.
I’ll say what my mom always said… again… “WATCH OUT FOR THE CARS”. Thats it. It is that simple.
The youngens are the ones who need to be looked out for.
That letter really irked me.
31. freewheelin | March 22nd, 2007 at 10:13 pm
The absolute WORST crossing guard is the old lady at 6th and Park. She almost NEVER does her job. I pass her every day and she always stands on the sidealk talking to her friends, ignoring the kids. She’s usually drinking a cup of coffee. I’ve seen little kids have to cross themselves while she completely ignores them. I’ve complained about her to Roberts’ office and the council person for the district but of course she’s there year after year. Sooner or later some kid is going to get hit at that corner. On the rare occasion when she does actually cross a kid and pay attention, she’s usually surly and unattentive.
32. freewheelin | March 22nd, 2007 at 10:17 pm
freewheelin wrote:
Whoops, obviously I didn’t mean she was both paying attention AND unattentive. I meant she was surly and inconsiderate.
33. wgenese | March 22nd, 2007 at 11:17 pm
freewheelin wrote:
She’s probably connected somehow to someone in the current administration. I’ll try and find out who she is. Has anyone else seen the 6th and Park lady in inaction?
A picture of her yapping it up with friends while some hapless children wander across the street would say a thousand words.
34. acarrino | March 23rd, 2007 at 3:49 pm
Dude, if crossing gaurds are suppossed to “direct traffic” at construction sites why are you required to hire an off-duty cop to direct traffic, and pay them an exorbinent sum, in cash, to do so?
35. acarrino | March 23rd, 2007 at 3:50 pm
obviously i dont know how the quotes work