The Identity Concept
You every think where the “identity” concept dilemma came from?
The “history,” as it’s said in this article – is not as precious as you may be led to believe.
The disruption of our society is most likely not happening “naturally.” It’s happening solely due to outside influences hell-bent on screwing with humanity. And that, my friends, is textbook psychopathy.
My heart goes out to any child that has ever been subjected to horrible mental abuse like this. Sickening, and worse than assault and even murder. This is a life sentence of pure, unadulterated torture and manipulation…
Read on – and maybe do some further digging. Expand your horizons.
The modern progressive will promote the idea that we have to tolerate everyone. This is increasingly harmful to people with mental illness. One group in specific, in many cases, are the transgendered. Anyone that promotes a different solution to their issues is labeled a bigot, a transphobe without listening to their arguments or objective medical information.
To understand more about the root of this problem, we should go back to the origin of the idea of gender identity.
The idea started with a sexologist in 1955 named John Money. The concept of gender identity is: what you think you are socially is more important than what you are from a standpoint which balances social and personal views. One problem that stems from this idea is the belief that there are no meaningful differences between the terms “sex” and “gender”. John Money had different ideas. He proposed that if a boy were raised as a girl they would fundamentally be female, and there are no intrinsic differences between the sexes — contrary to biology.
Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of male and female, respectively – not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex. — The American College of Pediatricians
He could not shill his ideas to anyone until he found a boy by the name of David Reimer. Shortly after birth, Reimer had lost his genitalia following an accident during his foreskin removal surgery. He decided to swoop in and perform some “progressive” human social experimentation on this helpless child who had just been mutilated. He had Reimer’s testicles also removed, and constructed an artificial vagina for him.
He then had his parents raise him as a girl while giving him hormone treatments. In what was by all measures the most extreme example of evil from Money, he had the young boy and his twin brother have fake sex acts at a young in an attempt to make David to be a “bottom.” He even made them undress and do even more sex acts such as genital inspection, which he took photographs of on at least one occasion.
Money would later talk about his experiments as successful, despite the fact that David never identified as a woman and would later recall the visits with Money as traumatic.
“Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – affirming countries. What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?”
As you can see from the video, the direct damage this type of human experimentation done on children is unacceptable. The danger of this lifestyle is still present in completely gender identity affirming countries like Sweden. It is a universally harmful thing for people to undergo this type of an experimentation. And completely irreversible, leaving the victims feeling helpless with no way out — except one: suicide, the final in a string choices they can’t undo. This “tolerance” of gender and LGBTQIA+ nonsense is leading to the deaths of those who could be happy, young, adult men with the right medication and treatment.
The abuse has not stopped with just what John Money and other’s have done in more recent years. A lesbian couple gave their 11-year-old son hormone blockers. The parents — the abusers — Pauline Moreno and Debra Lobel, Have claimed their son wanted to transition from his own initiative which is patently false. The mother decided to give him hormone blockers from a young age to delay his puberty: an irreversibly harmful process which is without a doubt child abuse.
Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child. — The American College of Pediatricians
“The lesbian parents of an 11-year-old boy who is undergoing the process of becoming a girl last night defended the decision, claiming it was better for a child to have a sex change when young.
Thomas Lobel, who now calls himself Tammy, is undergoing controversial hormone blocking treatment in Berkeley, California to stop him going through puberty as a boy. Pauline Moreno and Debra Lobel [the lesbian parents] warn that children with gender identity disorder forced to postpone transitioning could face a higher risk of suicide.
The mothers say that one of the first things Thomas told them when he learned sign language aged three – because of a speech impediment – was, ‘I am a girl’.
At age seven, after threatening genital mutilation on himself, psychiatrists diagnosed Thomas with gender identity disorder. By the age of eight, he began transitioning. This summer, he started taking hormone-blocking drugs, which will stop him from experiencing puberty.”
The child showed his parents the “desire” to be a girl at age three? (REALLY? WOW!) When children are that age they barely have self-awareness let alone a concept of gender. (At that age, I was telling my parents I wanted to be a pirate. My parents didn’t drive me to the doctor to get surgery to remove an eye and give me a peg leg.)
In another similar case, social workers were allowing a mother to raise her young son as a girl. She even went so far as to register him as a girl and has been referred to as “she” since he was four. Despite all this, and the alarm being raised by officials and the boy’s father, council staff failed to intervene. By the time a judge had to step in he was accusing the social workers of naivety and professional arrogance. The boy, whose name is hidden for privacy reasons, has been removed from his mother’s care and is happily in his father’s care in Northern England.
He now sees himself as male and plays with male gender toys; Power Rangers. The judge, Justice Hayden, said: “This is not a case about gender dysphoria, rather it is about a mother who has developed a belief structure which she has imposed upon her child.
“I am bound to say that had the concerns [of school staff] been given the weight that they plainly should have, it is difficult to resist the conclusion the boy could have been spared a great deal of emotional harm.”
He added: “Transgender equality has received a great deal of attention in recent times. I believe that in this case the profile and sensitivity of the matters raised by the mother blinded a number of professionals from applying their training, skill, and, it has to be said, common sense.”
“Conditioning children into believing that a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.”
By listening to John Money, a pedophile, and human experimenter, on his views of “gender identity”, we are humoring and coddling what amounts to mass delusion. Why is the public at large doing this to the mentally ill? It’s not kind to them. True progress in the medical field concerning gender dysphoria is being overlooked in the name of progress and tolerance.
And who is responsible for propagating the “gender identity” myth? John Money.
John Money, whose story ended by having David’s older brother Brian Reimer kill himself via an overdose of antidepressants. David suffered a much more brutal fate: he shot himself in the head with a sawed-off shotgun. This is the originator of “gender identity”. It was started by a pedophile who experimented on two ill-fated brothers, ultimately leading to their demise.