Global warming, really?

Graffiti smack down: Grounded Hoboken boat after Sandy

I’m sure by now, many of you already saw that leftist graffiti scribbled on the boat that washed ashore in Hoboken after Hurricane Sandy.

Some person (most likely closer to “youth” than “experienced”) wrote on the boat “Global Warming is Real…”

And we can be certain they haven’t done any real research or written a dissertation about it, that’s for sure. The person that wrote the original graffiti should have written “I believe what’s fed to me from mainstream media, my idiot Facebook friends, and politicians looking to funnel public money…”

But I was happy to see that someone didn’t want to tolerate this nonsensical message any longer, and grabbed a Sharpie of their own – and “extended” the moronic message to make it more realistic: “Global Warming is real, and so is Santa Claus!

Bravo to whomever put the original idiot in their place.

Have a good weekend!

7 Responses

  1. prag says:

    The world is flat! The moon landing was faked! Evolution is just a theory!

    • HansBrix says:

      Nice strawman. You see nothing wrong with a quasi-religious viewpoint that sees just about everything as back-casted proof of AGW theory as if the lunar cycle conspired with global warming to create a tidal event on 10/30? In december 1992 the same conspiracy took place to flood the path, right?

      This is my impression of agw proselytizers:

      * hot weather? Must be global warming
      * cold weather? Global warming!
      * wet weather? Global warming, you idiot
      * drought? Global warming obviously
      * etc
      * the science is in! Global warming will kill us all, the republicans are responsible.

      Also, regardiing evolution, do you subscribe to all of darwin’s theories or do you cherry pick what reflects your world view? For example, did evolution stop at the neck 50000 years ago? [quote comment=”218549″]The world is flat! The moon landing was faked! Evolution is just a theory![/quote]

      • hoboken411 says:

        @Hans – I had some a-hole commenters who actually accused *me* of writing said verbiage on that dopey boat.

        Can you believe that? They blatantly violated the posted comment rules. I just walk around town depicting what I see… shameful that some feel that I really have the time to get involved with nonsense like magic marker graffiti.

        If anything, I’d be much more prolific than that!

        [quote comment=”218555″]Nice strawman. You see nothing wrong with a quasi-religious viewpoint that sees just about everything as back-casted proof of AGW theory as if the lunar cycle conspired with global warming to create a tidal event on 10/30? In december 1992 the same conspiracy took place to flood the path, right?
        This is my impression of agw proselytizers:
        * hot weather? Must be global warming
        * cold weather? Global warming!
        * wet weather? Global warming, you idiot
        * drought? Global warming obviously
        * etc
        * the science is in! Global warming will kill us all, the republicans are responsible.
        Also, regardiing evolution, do you subscribe to all of darwin’s theories or do you cherry pick what reflects your world view? For example, did evolution stop at the neck 50000 years ago?

        [/quote]

      • HansBrix says:

        When you insult someone’s religion expect some blowback.[quote comment=”218556″]@Hans – I had some a-hole commenters who actually accused *me* of writing said verbiage on that dopey boat.Can you believe that? They blatantly violated the posted comment rules. I just walk around town depicting what I see… shameful that some feel that I really have the time to get involved with nonsense like magic marker graffiti.If anything, I’d be much more prolific than that![/quote]

  2. AMG1055 says:

    The global warming crowd is impossible to argue with, and only makes them believe that wacky progressive theory more and more. They’ll wake up one day, after their time as useful idiots has been used up.

  3. HansBrix says:

    Ive often wondered why the staunchest AGW proponents are not the most insistent anti-immigrationists. Taking AGW at face value, the last thing you want to do is move millions of very fertile 3rd worlders from low carbon footprint countries, to the country with the biggest carbon footprint of all EVERY YEAR.

    Yet AGWers are curiously silent on that matter.

    My guess is that touting AGW confers status among the Left leaning crowd and anti-immigration, which is practically crimethink, does the opposite.

  4. MidnightRacer says:

    The following natural chemical process creates the most GREEN on the planet, it’s the equation for photosynthesis, aka green plant growth worldwide throughout all of history

    6CO2 + 6H2O –>(sun light)–> C6H12O6 + 6O2 = photosynthesis

    carbon dioxide + water –>(sun light)–> sugar + oxygen = photosynthesis

    Without CO2, there’d be absolutely ZERO green plant growth on Earth. Yet, there are those of you who agree with the Destroyers that CO2 is a pollutant.

    In our atmosphere, CO2 are at historical lows at around 390 ppm, which is 0.039% of the atmosphere’s composition. That is called a trace gas. Water vapor (the mist that you see in green houses at gardening stores) is at 4000 ppm, or 0.40% of the atmosphere’s composition. It’s water vapor that’s a significant factor in the solar heat retention that holds heat under the atmosphere, kinda like actual green houses you see in the stores spraying water mist to do the same.

    Throughout the history of the earth, CO2 has ranged from highs of 10,000 ppm (the first atmosphere the planet had) to 6,000 ppm (600 million years ago). So in history, CO2 used to be 25 times and 15 times higher than today. The low point was about 150+ years ago at 285 ppm during the Little Ice Age (1300 – 1850 modern times). When CO2 was significantly higher (25 times to 15 times higher than today), green plants exploded.

    Remember that natural chemical process that requires CO2 for a green Earth?

    6CO2 + 6H2O –>(sun light)–> C6H12O6 + 6O2 = photosynthesis

    95% of yearly CO2 that rises into the upper atmosphere is contributed by nature.
    5% is contributed by human activities

    95% CO2 is released by the planet moreso when solar activity is increased which heats up the planet when CO2 is released from the oceans, ice, etc. Manufacturing and vehicles release 5%.

    From the Little Ice Age to now, solar activity has increased and CO2 has increased from 315 ppm in 1950, to about 390 ppm now. Human activity increased it by 0.01%.

    So why is it that some AGW believing scientists and the UN say CO2 caused the planet to get hotter? Because they commit the error of fallaciously assuming correlation equals causation, or basically superstition. When CO2 was 25 times and 15 times higher in the earth’s history, the global temperature did not correlate, and at times shifted cooler, though CO2 was multiple times higher than today. They resort to the correlation that CO2 increases during the Ice Age (10,000 years ago) broke the planet out of its freeze, yet no SUV’s and cars existed, neither manufacturing nor smoke pipes. Could’ve the CO2 come from volcanoes? And did warming not save living species from extinction? Or would they suppose that if we as humans can decrease CO2, and with the error of “correlation is causation” cool the planet down and freeze us all into a utopian bliss help the planet? Because a frozen planet is great, isn’t it? That’s ridiculous.

    And don’t forget, CO2 is the green gas in the history of the Earth, you know, since it’s essential in plant growth…

    carbon dioxide + water –>(sun light)–> sugar + oxygen = photosynthesis

Leave a Reply