More parking garage nightmares

Letter: Dangerous conditions at midtown Hoboken parking garage

One Hoboken411 reader wanted to let everyone know that there are many dangerous conditions at the city parking garage at 4th and Clinton:

“Firstly, I park in a reserved $285.00 spot on Grand and 3rd in the “private section” of the garage. It was damaged during Hurricane Sandy.

Here’s my dilemma: I have had to park in one of the upper floors since the storm hit which are only $185.00 dollar spots. I have repeatedly called the garage and Propark who completely mismanages the garage to begin with to ask for a credit because if I park in a $185 spot why pay $285?

A rude woman at the main office said “it’s open and I can park in the $285 spot no refunds, sorry!” Well I must tell you against my better judgment, I went and parked back in my old spot in private section.

The garage door doesnt work, it’s filthy, locks broken for months on end before the storm, dead animals strewn about, garbage everywhere and very dangerous as the lights are off as of 7:30am Sunday Nov 25th. A perfect place for rapists, muggers and their cohorts. Not to mention now it is so dark in there I cant even find my car by light of a cell phone. Garage is very unhelpful and wont even answer phone.

Can you can find my car?”

6 Responses

  1. Angry Bird says:

    There are dead animals strewn about the garage and it is utterly filthy and totally dark? Something is clearly very wrong here but I’m sorry I am laughing at how ridiculous this is!

    • rc9560 says:

      Firstly?

      You’re obviously not an english teacher.
      An english teacher would never be able to afford a $285 parking spot.

      My suggestion is to stop paying the $285 and start paying the $185.
      Move your car up to where it’s safer.[quote comment=”218364″]There are dead animals strewn about the garage and it is utterly filthy and totally dark? Something is clearly very wrong here but I’m sorry I am laughing at how ridiculous this is![/quote]

      • homeworld says:

        What’s wrong with “firstly?”

        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/firstlyquote comment=”218377″]Firstly?You’re obviously not an english teacher. An english teacher would never be able to afford a $285 parking spot.My suggestion is to stop paying the $285 and start paying the $185. Move your car up to where it’s safer.[/quote]

      • rc9560 says:

        Firstly, nothing is wrong with “Firstly” when it is followed up by “secondly” and a final summation.
        Secondly, the point is lost if you didn’t get the joke.
        And C. one needs to park elsewhere if one does not feel safe around the cohorts of rapists who feed on the entrails of dead animals.
        [quote comment=”218379″]What’s wrong with “firstly?”[/quote]

      • animal_lover says:

        “cohort” of rapist? Likely not a large enough group to follow stsistically for your purposes :).[quote comment=”218380″]Firstly, nothing is wrong with “Firstly” when it is followed up by “secondly” and a final summation. Secondly, the point is lost if you didn’t get the joke. And C. one needs to park elsewhere if one does not feel safe around the cohorts of rapists who feed on the entrails of dead animals.[/quote]

      • Chow says:

        Grammar police![quote comment=”218380″]Firstly, nothing is wrong with “Firstly” when it is followed up by “secondly” and a final summation. Secondly, the point is lost if you didn’t get the joke. And C. one needs to park elsewhere if one does not feel safe around the cohorts of rapists who feed on the entrails of dead animals.[/quote]

Leave a Reply