Jefferson Trust - 1st and Clinton
26
September
9/26/2007 Update:
Local resident Sean, who runs philly2hoboken.com has an update regarding a compromise that has been reached for this project:
He writes:
“As a result of the public’s concern, the developer compromised by changing the part of the area of the proposed restaurant into a retail store & area for the condo project. Also, the height of the tower was reduced significantly, keeping in-line with the height of the surrounding neighborhood. Gone was the valet parking, and there is a still a point of contention about the parking which we hope to resolve soon.
The developer also detailed multiple structural enhancements, keeping in line with the historic preservation of the site. The Bank sits in a flood plain, and the developer also plans to increase the height of the entire structure (more details on this to follow, from what I understood it would be raised about 5 feet). The facade, windows, moulding and copper treatments would be restored. The sidewalk, lighting and trees would be enhanced or added.”
Read previous updates below, and check his site for the full story.

6/18/2007 Update:
The Zoning Board has cancelled the meeting that was supposed to happen Tuesday the 19th, which means the Jefferson Trust Bank Building item will be carried, along with the rest of the agenda, to July 17th at 7pm. There was some question as to whether the ZBA would consider the Jefferson Trust item while it was still pending at the Historic Preservation Board. A developer proposal to build a seven story parking garage across Newark Street from the Jefferson Trust Condos in between Neumann Leather and the Napa Auto Parts was also on Tuesday’s ZBA agenda, and will be carried to July. Updated the Event Calender accordingly.
6/15/2007 Update:
Hoboken411 reader ‘Furey”, who’s a condo owner in the area had attended the recent meeting regarding this project.
He said:
There is simply no support by the public here, and many members of the committee seriously questioned this project. Everyone loves his idea to restore the Bank and how it could be made to look, but mostly everyone agrees that adding residential units on top of the building isn’t in the best interest of the community. The owner is trying to get thirteen - THIRTEEN - variances for this property.
Read the rest of his observations on his blog, Philly2Hoboken.com. More meetings scheduled this month.
6/9/2007 Update:
Originally, the next Historical Preservation Committee meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, June 12th. However, the city has moved the date up to MONDAY, June 11th at 7pm. The Hoboken Planning Board meeting is still on for Tuesday, June 19th at 7pm.
5/22/2007 Update:
In case anyone is interested, there will be a low-key review of this proposal in front of the Historic Preservation Committee tonight at 7:00pm (basement of city hall).
There will be an opportunity for the public to comment or “inquire within”. Not many important people will be there it seems, as some have other commitments. However, it has been said that this project/property shouldn’t even be listed by any Realtor since there is no official zoning in place. It may considered unethical, etc..
5/14/2007:
Over at the forever vacant (and still historically intact) Jefferson Trust building on 1st and Clinton, there finally appears to be some action happening.
Here is the letter that has been posted as of late (thanks 411 reader Furey):
“Dear Neighbor,
Below is an artist’s rendering of the proposed changed to the Jefferson Trust Bank Building.
The proposed changes are scheduled to be discussed at the Tuesday June 19th meeting of the Hoboken Zoning Board of Adjustment, City Hall, at 7pm.
If you’d like to voice your opinions regarding the proposed changes, I urge you to attend.
If possible, please could you notify any of your neighbors who may also be interested in attending.
Bill wfs4@optonline.net
wfs4@optonline.net”
Another reader wrote in that they have requested the city for numerous variances to build this eight-story luxury building and an extension of the bank to accommodate retail space and a restaurant.
This is of great concern to the residents in the area, as it may dramatically block the natural light to nearby residences. It is interesting to note that the residents of his building apparently only received one letter addressed to the Condo Board. It’s possible that many other neighbors are completely unaware of this proposal.
There are other concerns regarding the restaurant and possible bar, which may be within 500 feet of existing bars, which is considered a zoning violation.


















61. emarche | June 19th, 2007 at 2:28 pm
Right, but what if they did a full theater experience…a great theater that showed classic movies, even new releases…where you could get a beer while you watched, maybe some good food. I’d walk to that.
62. strand tramp | June 19th, 2007 at 2:40 pm
yeah, emarche…it’s called your living room. go buy a big HD flat panel and kick back. you can even light a cigarette if you want. and no homies on their cell phones or shooting at the screen!
63. matt_72 | June 19th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
There is no way any theater in town gets a liquor license. I agree that a plasma is way to go if you want a brewski with your film.
64. Journey | June 19th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
matt_72 wrote:
I would walk, but then I moved here because I don’t drive, I would love see movies in town. Right now I do the PATH to Manhattan to catch a film.
matt_72 wrote:
I agree for that myth to be true there would have to be ample parking, like as in suburban parking for a movie theater.
65. manolo | June 19th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
I think about this and I get excited….a venue where one can see a local theater company, dance reportory or a special showing or a special concert…..this could work. The forth ward needs balance and a mini Lincoln Center (very mini) would be the jewel. And a non profit to boot! The city could benefit by this, Dawn!!!!
66. danzig | September 26th, 2007 at 4:38 pm
manolo wrote:
Keep dreaming. Think nail salon and movie rental store. This is Hoboken. You sound so lovely and naive. You see those big buildings across the river? They look really close, right? In reality they are so far away you have no idea. I know it’s sad and humiliating, but it’s true. Any talk of dance or theatre rep here is just a dream, one that is pathetically impossible to realize.
67. LynnZe | September 26th, 2007 at 11:04 pm
The stench from the bum convention that has taken up residence on this stoop is unbearable sometimes. (sorry if that’s not PC to say - but they really smell on hot days)
I hope they come to a conclusion soon and put something here. Glad to hear it won’t be too high.
68. krewedetat | September 27th, 2007 at 1:00 am
The bums are part of the conspiracy to ge the variances.
69. Colonblow | October 1st, 2007 at 8:37 am
manolo wrote:
Absolutely. mini mini.
70. strand tramp | October 1st, 2007 at 9:43 am
i saw the former dog owner “homeless” guy sitting in front of the bank with a bike that looked like it was worth $1000 bucks! is he the guy the cops reported in the Blotter as the homeless guy that stole a bike out of the condo garage, or is it a different homeless thief? so hard to keep track of these poor people who need our help, and our personal property.