Hoboken: City for Sale (Part III)
Wheeling still prevalent
For those of you that read this article from 411 contributor estevens back in March – you remember how he shined light on the giant loophole in New Jersey’s campaign contribution laws.
NorthJersey.com has an interesting article today about how the “wheeling and dealing” continues in the Garden State, – with $19,000 being contributed to ex-Mayor Peter Cammarano’s campaign from a South Jersey “Political Committee” this year! Seems like Hoboken’s Pay-to-Play laws are easily circumvented.
[This is part of a series of article submissions by resident and 411 reader “estevens.”]
Hoboken: City for Sale
Third in a series of articles about the back-room machinations of Hoboken.
Brokers and Bribes
First, if you please, a little perspective: In September of 2007, eleven New Jersey politicians were arrested as part of an FBI sting operation for accepting cash bribes in return for using their official influence to award contracts.
The 18-month investigation – Operation Broken Boards – began in mid-2006 amid evidence of corruption in the Pleasantville school district (an Abbott district near Atlantic City). Cooperating witnesses and undercover agents established two undercover companies for insurance brokerage and roofing. Five school board members accepted thousands of dollars in bribes from the fictitious businessmen in return for their assistance in steering public contracts to the two companies. Incredibly, they also referred the brokers to corrupt public officials in northern New Jersey who, in turn, referred them to yet more corrupt officials. All eleven politicians, plus a chief of staff to a Newark council president, pleaded guilty or were found guilty by trial of accepting bribes. [See list below]
There is a fine line between cash bribes and campaign contributions from those who receive public contracts. In Hoboken, campaign contributions go hand-in-hand with the awarding of insurance consulting contracts. Business & Governmental Insurance Agency (BGIA) has repeatedly received contracts with the City of Hoboken as well as the Board of Education. In return, campaign contributions from BGIA and its president, Steve Edwards, totaling more than $37,000 have been made over the past nine years to local candidates and political party committees allied with or controlled by Mayor David Roberts.
Continue with more after the jump…
(Hoboken: A city for sale, Part 3, continued…)
Insurance consultants are typically awarded professional services contracts or extraordinary unspecifiable services contracts, which ostensibly allow public officials to award contracts based on experience and reputation. In fact, this allows our officials to award contracts at will with little regard for cost. Insurance consultants are typically paid by the insurance provider and thereby may make more money for the provider – and themselves – by selecting more expensive plans for the city. While we would hope that city officials select a consultant who will get the city the best plan for the least cost, it is quite likely that those who make substantial campaign contributions may get the nod with little regard for cost to the city.
Hoboken’s Pay-to-Play Reform ordinances of 2004 and 2007 were adopted to control the influence of campaign contributions on the awarding of such contracts. Since then, our officials have mouthed adherence to the rules while quietly playing games to circumvent the rules. In 2007, BGIA had a contract with the city when it made a $2000 contribution to Hoboken Councilman Ruben Ramos, who suggests in this video that no law can stop him from taking illegal contributions. Though the contribution was made to his state assembly campaign, the city ordinance does not allow for any contributions from a business entity with professional/extraordinary contracts to any officeholder involved in the awarding of contracts to that business entity. Per the penalty clause of the city ordinance, BGIA is apparently ineligible for city contracts for four years, though it did continue to provide services for the Hoboken BOE the following year.
Wheeling and dealing
Enter Federal Hill Risk Management (formerly Gartland Associates), an insurance brokerage firm out of Maryland. On May 25, 2007 during the spring election season, Federal Hill, Dynamic Claims Management (a sister company), Gartland & Company, Diana Gartland, and Victor Bramble (a manager with Federal Hill), all made $300 contributions to Ruben Ramos’ assembly campaign. The contributions met the $300 limit set by Hoboken’s pay-to-play laws for the one-year period prior to awarding of a contract, though such bundling could potentially violate the terms of the ordinance and certainly violate the spirit of the law.
On the same date, a little-known political committee called Committee for Efficiency in Government, run out of an apartment at 108 Monroe Street, made a $5000 contribution to Ruben Ramos as well. A week later, Gartland & Co, E-Administrative Systems (same address as Gartland), Dynamic Claims Management, and Victor Bramble made a total of $5000 in contributions to Committee for Efficiency. This was apparently what is referred to as “wheeling” – a pass-through of money to circumvent Hoboken’s pay-to-play law – or was perhaps just another remarkable Hoboken coincidence.
On September 4, 2007, Derek Johnson – a manager with Federal Hill – contributed $2000 to Voice for All Hoboken, a political committee managed by City Councilman and Mayoral candidate Peter Cammarano, which made contributions to and spent money in 2007 on behalf of candidates Chris Campos, Michael Russo, Theresa Castellano, Nino Giacchi, and Richard Tremitiedi. Evidently, someone in the campaign thought better of it and returned the $2000 ten days later. On September 24, Committee for Efficiency made a $2000 contribution to Voice and then received $3000 from Derek Johnson four days later. On December 7, Federal Hill was awarded the contract to serve as insurance consultant for the City of Hoboken. Yet another remarkable Hoboken coincidence?
Getting back to where we started, politicians around the state have gone to jail for accepting cash bribes in return for their official influence in awarding insurance brokerage contracts. In Hoboken, thousands of dollars in “gratuities” are considered business as usual so long as they are deposited in political campaign accounts. Our local politicians will wrap themselves in the American flag and opine about the First Amendment and free speech, but any reasonable person can understand what is behind these machinations.