31 Responses to ** HUMC Rumor is false **

• 21. MorrisCK January 12th 2009 - 16:35:32 |

  hoboken411 wrote:

  With 6200 entries on this site – some mistakes are bound to happen. I ran with a hunch because if some rapist was running around terrorizing women, then better to be on the safe side. Nobody was named specifically, so it wasn’t libelous. But sadly, I wouldn’t put it past our town and many organizations in it to pull something like this.

  Glad it was “whew – glad it didn’t happen,” rather than “oh no, that sucks…”

  Then again – “if a tree falls in the forest…” Just saying. You know this town and how they like keeping things quiet….

  Honestly, I really think it was a bad choice to post a rumor of this kind and I think you should shy away from doing so in the future. To say you would rather “err on the side of caution” isn’t the right move.

  Anyway, I can’t imagine to begin with anyone from the hospital or the town keeping something like this under wraps. Heads would roll if it happened again and it ever got out there was a cover up of a first incident.

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 22. mooshu January 12th 2009 - 17:38:18 |

  Hey. A mistake like this is NOWHERE near as huge as the amount of ignorant posters on this site who find themselves entitled to this, that and the other. So let’s get over it, m’kay?

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 23. beamrider9 January 12th 2009 - 17:57:45 |

  hoboken411 wrote:

  I ran with a hunch because if some rapist was running around terrorizing women, then better to be on the safe side.

  I’m not sure whether it’s more appropriate to label that “sensationalism” or “fear-mongering”, but either way it’s pretty weak, regardless of whether you consider this a news site, a “community” site, or Perry’s Funtime Gossip Corner.

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 24. UrbanRose January 12th 2009 - 18:23:02 |

  People are you f*cking serious? Perry runs this site and always has the most current, up-to-date information regarding this city. Then, he posts with the intent to fore-warn people if indeed there is a rapist, and you guys want to tattoo INRI on his forehead. That is just ridiculous. Considering, their is a “possible” rapist on the HPD you never know. So Perry, No need for an apology, just continue doing your thing and a great job you are doing at it. To the rest, No harm no foul.

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 25. mooshu January 12th 2009 - 18:24:39 |

  UrbanRose wrote:

  People are you f*cking serious? Perry runs this site and always has the most current, up-to-date information regarding this city. Then, he posts with the intent to fore-warn people if indeed there is a rapist, and you guys want to tattoo INRI on his forehead. That is just ridiculous. Considering, their is a “possible” rapist on the HPD you never know. So Perry, No need for an apology, just continue doing your thing and a great job you are doing at it.

  To the rest, No harm no foul.

  Thank you!

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 26. xofalconxo January 12th 2009 - 18:30:21 |

  UrbanRose wrote:

  People are you f*cking serious? Perry runs this site and always has the most current, up-to-date information regarding this city. Then, he posts with the intent to fore-warn people if indeed there is a rapist, and you guys want to tattoo INRI on his forehead. That is just ridiculous. Considering, their is a “possible” rapist on the HPD you never know. So Perry, No need for an apology, just continue doing your thing and a great job you are doing at it.

  To the rest, No harm no foul.

  Ditto. I live in that neighborhood. I was skeptical of this rumor from the start (see post 1), but I’d rather make up my own mind as to its likely truth based on the info provided. Besides, it came with the disclaimer that it was just a rumor, so WTF is the problem?

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 27. UrbanRose January 12th 2009 - 18:39:46 |

  xofalconxo wrote:

  UrbanRose wrote:

  People are you f*cking serious? Perry runs this site and always has the most current, up-to-date information regarding this city. Then, he posts with the intent to fore-warn people if indeed there is a rapist, and you guys want to tattoo INRI on his forehead. That is just ridiculous. Considering, their is a “possible” rapist on the HPD you never know. So Perry, No need for an apology, just continue doing your thing and a great job you are doing at it.

  To the rest, No harm no foul.

  Ditto. I live in that neighborhood. I was skeptical of this rumor from the start (see post 1), but I’d rather make up my own mind as to its likely truth based on the info provided. Besides, it came with the disclaimer that it was just a rumor, so WTF is the problem?

  I think what really bothers me more, is the people that have the balls to state the negativity are probably the ones who log on Morning/Noon/Night for information.

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 28. MorrisCK January 12th 2009 - 18:42:34 |

  UrbanRose wrote:

  People are you f*cking serious? Perry runs this site and always has the most current, up-to-date information regarding this city. Then, he posts with the intent to fore-warn people if indeed there is a rapist, and you guys want to tattoo INRI on his forehead. That is just ridiculous. Considering, their is a “possible” rapist on the HPD you never know. So Perry, No need for an apology, just continue doing your thing and a great job you are doing at it.

  To the rest, No harm no foul.

  Based on an anonymous email!!!!There was no merit to it whatsoever. There wasn’t one iota of fact to back it up!!!

  So from now on, every time someone sends something in it gets a thread to scare people??? There’s a possible axe murder running loose at City Bistro. Can we start a thread until there’s a confirmation???

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 29. MorrisCK January 12th 2009 - 19:01:07 |

  UrbanRose wrote:

  xofalconxo wrote:

  UrbanRose wrote:

  People are you f*cking serious? Perry runs this site and always has the most current, up-to-date information regarding this city. Then, he posts with the intent to fore-warn people if indeed there is a rapist, and you guys want to tattoo INRI on his forehead. That is just ridiculous. Considering, their is a “possible” rapist on the HPD you never know. So Perry, No need for an apology, just continue doing your thing and a great job you are doing at it.

  To the rest, No harm no foul.

  Ditto. I live in that neighborhood. I was skeptical of this rumor from the start (see post 1), but I’d rather make up my own mind as to its likely truth based on the info provided. Besides, it came with the disclaimer that it was just a rumor, so WTF is the problem?

  I think what really bothers me more, is the people that have the balls to state the negativity are probably the ones who log on Morning/Noon/Night for information.

  Wow, is that a telling post.

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 30. mooshu January 12th 2009 - 19:01:42 |

  MorrisCK wrote:

  UrbanRose wrote:

  People are you f*cking serious? Perry runs this site and always has the most current, up-to-date information regarding this city. Then, he posts with the intent to fore-warn people if indeed there is a rapist, and you guys want to tattoo INRI on his forehead. That is just ridiculous. Considering, their is a “possible” rapist on the HPD you never know. So Perry, No need for an apology, just continue doing your thing and a great job you are doing at it.

  To the rest, No harm no foul.

  Based on an anonymous email!!!!There was no merit to it whatsoever. There wasn’t one iota of fact to back it up!!!

  So from now on, every time someone sends something in it gets a thread to scare people??? There’s a possible axe murder running loose at City Bistro. Can we start a thread until there’s a confirmation???

  Um, hm. Get over yourself?

  
  

  Login or Register to reply

• 31. hoboken411 January 12th 2009 - 19:17:50 |

  I’m going to close this thread now.

  I was going to add some more information about this that I learned recently, but will keep that to myself until it’s substantiated.

  Does anyone else find it interesting that Quigley signed up so quickly to refute this? “Damage control?”

  But we’ll let this fizzle out now instead…

  

  
  

  Login or Register to reply