Mason and The Mayor
07
May
5/7/2008:
No, not a new Disney animated movie, but real life politics and shenanigans!
It’s highly recommended that you read this whole article to get the “truth” to the spin being “spewed” out of city hall.
Roberts attacks Mason on Hospital Lawsuit
Was the attempt to save St. Mary Hospital a “Miracle” or a financial “House of Cards” about to fall?
No one can tell for sure since the Hoboken University Medical Center keeps its books closed to the public that could be left holding the tab. The battle to open them up goes from a courtroom to the Hoboken City Council meeting tonight as Mayor David Roberts once again takes aim at Councilwoman Beth Mason.
15 months ago Hoboken taxpayers guaranteed a $52 million bond to “save” the financially crippled St. Mary Hospital. The board of the Hoboken Municipal Hospital Authority was hand picked by Roberts. Not long after it was formed, the HMHA declared itself exempt from the Open Public Record Act and denied members of the public from seeing detailed finances. This even though the public guaranteed the HMHA’s credit and the city would be forced to deal with the Hospital and its employees should it fail. Sound suspicious to you?
Concerned about where all this was headed (especially since Mayor Roberts kept saying he could always up-zone the hospital for condos if they couldn’t make it work) then-citizen Beth Mason sued to get the books open. Click here to Read Hoboken411’s coverage of that debate, including the pros and cons of the bailout as described to the NJ Department of Community Affairs.
HMHA refuses to settle suits
With the State cutting aid to hospitals, and more teetering on the brink of failure every day, there is a new effort to whitewash HUMC and silence Mason ( Download PDF Here). This time it comes from Councilman (and Assemblyman) Ruben Ramos in the form of a City Council Resolution “Demanding Councilwoman Elizabeth Mason drop her lawsuit against the Hoboken Municipal Hospital Authority.” (screenshot)
Here is the second ward councilwoman’s reaction to the resolution, and update on where Hoboken stands with its Hospital:
What are they trying to hide?
MASON SAYS MAYOR IS TRYING TO SHORT CIRCUIT FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE INTO HOBOKEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Council Resolution Is Misguided Attempt to Thwart Mason Inquiry Into Operations
A resolution added to this week’s Hoboken City Council agenda targeted at Councilwoman Beth Mason’s attempts to uncover financial dealings at the authority that oversees the Hoboken University Medical Center (HUMC) is a blatant attempt by Mayor David Roberts to mislead the city council and the taxpayers of Hoboken, says Mason. The resolution demands that Mason stop pursuing the financial records of the hospital authority arguing that her inquiry into the hospital’s finance will “disrupt the authority.”
Read the rest of this political debacle after the jump…
(Roberts ATTACKS Mason, continued…)
Mason says the resolution is merely an attempt by a desperate mayor to shield the authority he created from public scrutiny and to keep the council in the dark. Recently the authority, handpicked by the mayor and political insiders — has declared that Hoboken Hospital is an economic miracle. Yet, the authority has failed to certify this miracle with any financial facts brought to the council,” said Mason.
“The facts that we do know for sure is that the authority was formed without public consent and borrowed $52 million that the taxpayers are responsible for if the hospital fails – and the taxpayers were never given the opportunity to decide if they wanted to put $52 million of their money at risk on a failing hospital,” added Mason.
Mason notes that she has attempted to settle her public access litigation with the hospital several times over the last few months and that each settlement was declined by the authority. “I’m not the one prolonging the litigation, the authority is. You have to ask yourself why? What don’t they want to admit or disclose?”
Court Battle Continues
Over the past two weeks, attorneys for the authority and Mason have been embroiled in a contentious court case over illegal meetings and operation of the authority. Mason said that Mayor Roberts does not like the way the hearings are going and is desperately trying to prevent a ruling against the authority that would force the authority to reveal its finances and how it spends money.
“The mayor’s PR campaign for the authority is to declare that the hospital pulled off a financial miracle, but there are no facts to support that claim. Now the mayor is trying to hoodwink the council into supporting the miracle claim. Yet, not one member of the city council knows the real financial health of the hospital or how the authority is spending its money,” said Mason. “If any council member has seen the hospital’s financial records and can state with certainty that the hospital is indeed a financial miracle and that the public’s $52 million investment is safe, I hope they come to the meeting prepared to show us the documents.”
Mason said according to court testimony, the authority seems to be operating without adequate staff and with a secretary who testified she routinely shreds documents of the hospital’s CEO, Harvey Holzberg, who pulls down an $800,000 a year salary – a figure Mason said is astounding given the finances of the hospital. Holzberg was the former CEO of the University of Medicine and Dentistry which was the subject of an intensive federal investigation for fraud and misappropriation of funds.
Mason said there is plenty of reason to be concern about the hospital’s ability to meet its payroll and other obligations when urban hospitals throughout the nation are facing a financial crisis.
Evaluation of Hospital Finances
Mason, a business consultant, pointed to a recent nationwide hospital evaluation by Alvarez & Marsal Healthcare Industry Group — one of the nation’s leading healthcare restructuring firms, which published its 2007 study of hospitals across the nation in a recent issue of The Wall Street Journal. The study found that more than half of short-term acute-care hospitals in the United States are technically insolvent or at risk of insolvency
The report noted that: “As states and municipalities begin to limit spending in the face of slumping tax revenues and a weakening economy, the financial health of many hospitals is likely to further deteriorate. Many will encounter serious liquidity crises and face the prospect of radically.”
George Pillari, a managing director of the health care group at Alvarez & Marsal, said, “We’re seeing hospital insolvencies and hospital bankruptcies — it’s the heyday right now,” adding, “We’re going to see continued insolvencies; we’re going to see more bankruptcies this year than last year.”
Mason –- applying the Alvarez methodology to the financial information that is available about Hoboken University Medical Center — found the hospital most likely is in the bottom fifth of hospitals in the nation.
Mason estimates that for the year ended December 31, 2007 — the Hoboken Medical Center lost $38 million – before subsidies from the state and federal government. Mason estimates that part of the reason for the big 2007 loss is that expenses were $8 million more than budgeted. Half the over-expenditures went to overpayments for salaries ($4 million) and the rest taken up by supplies ($3 million) and non-professional fees ($1.5 million). Mason noted that the former St. Mary Hospital owner, Bon Secours, was supposed to give almost $12 million to the authority, but actually gave only $7 million.
Mason notes that with Gov. Jon Corzine trying to trim the state’s budget by cutting subsidies to hospitals – the long term fiscal prognosis of Hoboken hospital is not good. “If the hospital were a patient you would have to say that its long term prognosis is questionable,” said Mason. “How long can this institution go on relying on state and federal handouts at a time when the state is in a financial crisis and federal government isn’t much better.”
“My main reason for seeking open public records information about the hospital is my concern about its operations and its ability to meet its payroll and other financial obligations. I am also very concerned that the hospital authority is able to protect the huge public investment made in the hospital,” said the councilwoman.
“The mayor and the hospital CEO can’t just declare an economic miracle and then stop public scrutiny into how the hospital operates.”
“We saw what happened with UMDNJ – and I am not suggesting anything that serious is occurring here — but the city council has an obligation to know how the authority is operating and to report its findings to the public. We can’t do that if the hospital authority wants to keep us in the dark.”
More on St. Mary/HUMC on Hoboken411:
- Mason urges Roberts to help settle suit
- Maureen Sullivan on Harvey Holzberg
- HUMC tries to silence Hoboken411 critics
- Theft Probe at St. Mary Hospital









81. sanity | May 9th, 2008 at 12:15 am
YipYap wrote:
Bolded for extra
Personally (and as much as I disagree with the splitting of the school board vote), I think what Beth is doing is a great thing here, though she might have wanted to enlist Cunningham. Wasn’t he a muni bond specialist?
Did anyone check the OS for the bonds for the financials of the hospital, or any of the NRMSIRs for the annual filings? This is a double barrel hospital revenue credit backed by the city, no?*
*Of course, these questions are PURE SPECULATION on my part becuase I’m too lazy to get the filings myself, so I know nothing about the deal.
82. Cat | May 9th, 2008 at 6:50 am
westy wrote:
Given that choice I’d vote for PATH train Teddy.
83. Katie_Scarlett | May 9th, 2008 at 8:05 am
sanity - I am 99% sure Cunningham is in sales for the bank he works for, and what he sells is their ability to work on munis, but I don’t know that he himself has any actually real first hand experience working with munis. I could be wrong though.
84. FAP | May 9th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Yip and Sanity I’m gonna let you in on a little secret. Most people in this town have no opinion on the term reformer because they pay almost no attention to local politics or the self important groups that inhabit it. Most don’t even know who Mason is, or who their own council person is for that matter.
While I like much of what mason is trying to do I think she’d get more accomplished if she would work with people on the council who have similar goals and try to break off the remaining needed votes from the old guard factions. And Sanity I agree with you, her move with the school board election was a rookie blunder.
Sanity I’m glad you brought up the financials. If Ramos, who is running on Roberts ticket for an at-large seat, hadn’t sponsored this hit-resolution on Mason do you think we would have focused on the 24 million tax bond (the TAN) that was on the agenda or the crazy, possibly illegal, financing scheme Roberts is trying to use to close a 4 million dollar budget hole. If ruled illegal by the state people are going to see the 4th quarter tax bill spike up 4 million dollars.
Gosh it’s almost like Team Roberts was trying to distract us with a meaningless resolution.
85. Colonblow | May 9th, 2008 at 9:39 am
Makes sense FAP. Trees for 90 minutes, meaningless resolution for 90 minutes.
86. Red Haven | May 9th, 2008 at 9:52 am
FAP, I will just agree to disagree with you on your first point, because I agree the second one you bring up is far more important and deserves discussion.
FAP wrote:
It is never a rookie blunder to endorse people because your conscience and deductive reasoning tell you that they would serve the public the best. It is a far better choice than taking the politically expedient way out.
FAP wrote:
The sad fact is that they would never have put up this financing scheme for a vote if they didn’t already know the political lackeys in Trenton would support it. The Department of Community Affairs is now run by former Bayonne Mayor (and HCDO bigshot) Joe Doria, with the DCA’s Local Finance Board heavily influenced by Weehawken Mayor (and HCDO bigshot) Richard Turner.
FAP, you and I both know that this is awful public policy and should be ruled illegal. Sadly, the state just doesn’t care.
87. matt_72 | May 9th, 2008 at 10:07 am
Red Haven wrote:
And Roberts and his allies on the city council don’t care either. Neither do the city workers who come out in large numbers to support these folks. None of them care that they are destroying the finances of the city.
88. TrumpT3 | May 9th, 2008 at 10:28 am
Red, regarding the rookie blunder and supporting those your conscious tells you, that makes sense in theory, but then why did she not help zimmer and cunningham in their campaigns (which they both finally told the reporter last week in the article), and if she bcame mayor, would she be unwilling to work with them and their suporters too? i just ask as a voter and i think it’s a fair question, at least, cunningham and zimmer wanted to know that too
89. Red Haven | May 9th, 2008 at 10:40 am
TrumpT3, I support all three of these councilmembers when they stand up to do the right thing. That it what matters today.
Mason helped Zimmer and Cunningham early in their campaigns. When Zimmer turned to the HCDO for help, Mason could no longer help. Cunningham had Mason’s help, and then made his own decision to run a campaign independent of her, not the other way around.
Since the elections a year ago all three have worked together and apart to make positive change for the city, and I’m sure that will continue until their time on the council ends. It’s much ado about nothing at this point that only aids and abets the Mayor.
90. FAP | May 9th, 2008 at 10:58 am
Redhaven have you never heard of the expression “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. The Hudson democratic machine was having a civil war last year, which isn’t quite done yet, and Dawn took advantage of it. Plus I think you’ll agree that Mason had stopped supporting Dawn BEFORE the first election which is before Dawn took advantage of the HCDO civil war. Not to mention Dawn walked away from it owing them nothing. That’s pragmatic effective politics.
And I think the Cunningham volunteers would disagree with your account as well but I’ll leave it for them to dispute.
I think Cunningham’s recent letter disputes the working relationship you describe. While I hope things get better I can confidently say that Mason wasn’t a help to either Dawn, or Peter, during their races and it doesn’t sound like she’s working well with them now. I hope this changes but I can only imagine the level of frustration Councilman Cunningham must have to have published his letter.
91. Red Haven | May 9th, 2008 at 11:09 am
Congratulations FAP. You’ve brought a smile to Mayor Roberts’ face on this dreary Friday. Focusing again on silly inside political baseball instead of how he is wrecking this town.
92. FAP | May 9th, 2008 at 11:28 am
Red I’m just recounting what I personally experienced. If it brings a smile to Roberts face blame the people who as councilman Cunningham says surround Mason and are the cause of this rift.
That’s in the past though. I would love to see all three reform/independent/call-em-what-ya-like councilpeople work together. Next year’s budget, which starts July 1st, would be an excellent place to start. Let’s not repeat the absurdity we’re seeing now.
Plus I’d like to see the council hire an independent forensic accounting firm to go over the books and for Roberts to fulfill his promise to Councilman Cunningham and have the city go out and get a Bond rating.
93. Cat | May 9th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Red Haven wrote:
So under the guise of reform and idealism, you’ve found ANOTHER way to snipe. You and FAP should just sleep together already. Sheesh.
94. FourthStShuffle | May 10th, 2008 at 9:50 am
red it brought a bigger smile to roberts face when the results of the school board election were in and you defended masons hand in that, so why dont you just answer fap response instead of trying to squelch his opinon or call it ‘baseball’ when being able to work with other5s is a requirement if she runs for mayor? you said one thing, he responded, you dismissed it
also someone told me mason supported russo for hha
95. sanity | May 11th, 2008 at 3:03 am
FAP wrote:
Actually, I was just pointing out how Yip attacked you with the same terms he’s defending Mason.
Red Haven wrote:
Right, because the current board is truly a far better choice.
FAP wrote:
Umm… Weren’t some of the Hoboken bonds insured by FGIC? Now that FGIC no longer has the AAA rating, shouldn’t the underlying ratings on those bonds show through (provided that Hoboken is rated better than FGIC)?*
*again, PURE SPECULATION on my part, given that I’m too lazy to bloomberg this stuff myself.
Katie_Scarlett wrote:
I thought sales side people were that much more familiar with OSs?
96. FAP | May 11th, 2008 at 9:02 am
Good question.
Since Hoboken currently has no credit rating, with any agency(S&P, Fitch, Moody’s), it wouldn’t. In other words there’s no underlying to show through.
At a council meeting some weeks ago Councilman Cunningham extracted a promise from Mayor Roberts to get a credit rating from one of the major raters. I look forward to seeing what happens with that promise.
97. upyurs | May 11th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
FAP all you do is complain, if you had any idea what is going on maybe you would make a positive statement. At the last council meeting Castellano mentioned that they had a meeting with the New State Controller office who was surprised that a City would ask them to look at their books. Usally it is the State asking to come in. They appeared to agrre to look at the books and the CFO sent them a number of documents they asked for. SO WE ARE GETTING A FORENSIC AUDIT. Also, at the meeting it was disclosed that Moody’s was coming in on Monday to review the rating of the City. If all you can do is complain maybe you, Lenz and Tony S could run for office and see what kind of votes you get.
98. matt_72 | May 11th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
The state is almost as financially mismanaged as Hoboken is, so why would a “clean bill of health” from them assure you? And while the state may look at the books, they certainly won’t be looking at the contracting & hiring practices of the city, the level of nepotism, the staffing levels, the lack of compensation the city recieves for zoning variances, etc….
The city needs to hire a nationally recoginized consulting firm, hold public hearings on the findings of the firm (and release the report to the public) and develop a plan for dealing with any problems this firm finds with how the city conducts its business. The last thing we need is some whitewash report that is prepared by a bunch of political hacks out of Trenton.